Vasoconstriction by Electrical Stimulation: New Approach to Control of Non-Compressible Hemorrhage
Article tools
Non-compressible hemorrhage is the most common preventable cause of death on battlefield and in civilian traumatic injuries. We report the use of microsecond pulses of electric current to induce rapid constriction in femoral and mesenteric arteries and veins in rats. Electrically-induced vasoconstriction could be induced in seconds while blood vessels dilated back to their original size within minutes after stimulation. At higher settings, a blood clotting formed, leading to complete and permanent occlusion of the vessels. The latter regime dramatically decreased the bleeding rate in the injured femoral and mesenteric arteries, with a complete hemorrhage arrest achieved within seconds. The average blood loss from the treated femoral artery during the first minute after injury was about 7 times less than that of a non-treated control. This new treatment modality offers a promising approach to non-damaging control of bleeding during surgery, and to efficient hemorrhage arrest in trauma patients.
Introduction
Trauma is the leading cause of death among US individuals younger than 44 years. Hemorrhagic shock accounts for 30–40 percent of traumatic mortality, . Bleeding is also the most common preventable cause of death on battlefield. Applications of tourniquets to compressible hemorrhages, , , , caused a marked decrease in limb exsanguinations, , . As a result, according to the US army, hemorrhage not amenable to truncal tourniquets (also called non-compressible hemorrhage) is now the leading cause of preventable death. Part of the non-compressible hemorrhages occur due to bleeding into body cavities (such as the abdomen or chest), while others are caused by wounds in the junction between the trunk and the limbs or neck. The latter ones, called junctional hemorrhages, are recognized as a care gap, and those of the pelvic, buttock and groin area are of highest prevalence. Though Combat Gauze™ is endorsed by the US Army for bleeding care in areas not amenable to a tourniquet, it is often ineffective in junctional hemorrhages such as groin, gluteal, axilla, shoulder and others, , , . A novel mechanical compressing device, the Combat Ready Clamp, was recently introduced into the US Army, , but has not yet been proven clinically. This device cannot be applied to wounds of the head, neck, abdomen and chest.
Effective prevention of blood loss in the pre-hospital arena offers the best opportunity to save soldiers with non-compressible injuries, therefore major efforts are undertaken to develop technologies for this unmet need. In early 70 s, it was demonstrated that thrombosis can be induced in a clamped blood vessel by minutes-long application of direct electric current, , . However, associated thermal damage precluded the use of this technology in clinical practice. Reduction in blood perfusion during electro-chemotherapy was also noted previously, and it was found to enhance the antitumor effect of the chemotherapy, . More recently, constriction of blood vessels and thrombosis without thermal damage have been achieved with short (μs-ms) electric pulses. However, these techniques have not been characterized in mammals, nor have they been evaluated for clinical use in various bleeding scenarios.
Recently we described significant decrease in blood loss from liver injury in rabbits treated by sub-millisecond electrical pulses. The current study evaluates the effect of microsecond pulses on blood vessels in two areas non-amenable to truncal tourniquets: the groin area (femoral) and the abdominal cavity (mesenteric). We demonstrate significant vasoconstriction and decrease in blood loss following injury of these blood vessels. These results indicate a possibility of controlling non-compressible hemorrhage using non-thermal pulsed electrical stimulation.
Results
Constriction of femoral and mesenteric blood vessels
Stimulation current was applied to the exposed blood vessel via 2 mm diameter pipette electrode filled with saline, while a large pad return electrode was applied to skin on the back side on the animal via conductive gel. Biphasic (symmetric, anodic-first square) pulses of electric current with duration of 1 μs per phase, amplitude of 250 V and repetition rate of 10 Hz caused, within seconds, a very pronounced local constriction of both femoral () and mesenteric () arteries and veins. Extent of the constriction of femoral vessels in response to 10 seconds long stimulation at 1 Hz repetition rate is plotted in , as a function of stimulus amplitude and duration. Vasoconstriction increased with higher pulse amplitude and longer duration for both arteries and veins. For all pulse durations tested, vessels diameter decreased with increasing pulse amplitude along a sigmoid curve, having a response threshold on the lower end, and reaching a minimum size of about 20–25% of the original diameter on the high end (). Strength-duration dependence of the 25% and 50% constriction thresholds could be approximated by a power dependence t−a, where a was approximately 0.3 for femoral arteries and veins (). For all pulse durations, lower voltage was required to reach similar constriction in arteries, compared to veins, although the difference decreased at longer durations.
Extent of vasoconstriction increased not only with the stimulus amplitude but also with the pulse repetition rate, for both the arteries () and veins (). In this set of measurements, stimulation was applied during 2 minutes, but the vessels constricted to the minimum diameter within about a minute. After the end of stimulation, the blood vessel slowly dilated back to its original width within about 10 minutes (). The recovery time to 90% of the original diameter increased with pulse repetition rate. For example, for 1 Hz it was about 4 minutes, while for 103 Hz it was about 8 minutes.
Response of blood vessels to continuous stimulation was measured during 10 minute intervals, with the frequency increasing with each step, as shown in . Again, the vessels reached the minimum size at each particular frequency within about a minute, and then remained at approximately steady state, with the extent of constriction dependent on the repetition rate. Vasoconstriction was stronger in arteries than in veins for each pulse frequency with both transient () and continuous () stimulation, and the difference was more pronounced at higher repetition rates. Maximum response to continuous stimulation () was smaller than to the transient stimulation regime (), especially at higher repetition rates.
Mesenteric blood vessels () had similar kind of response to that of the femoral arteries and veins. For the same pulse parameters, the extent of vasoconstriction in mesenteric arteries was higher than in femoral arteries (), and the difference increased with larger amplitudes. For example, with 1 μs pulses at 200 V mesenteric arteries constricted by 76%, compared to 49% reduction in femoral arteries. Mesenteric veins constricted more than the femoral veins at low amplitudes, while this ratio reversed at higher amplitudes.
Hemorrhage control during vascular injury
Complete cut of a femoral artery represents a model of traumatic injury leading to profound loss of blood by the animal. Applying 100 μs pulses of 150 V (corresponding to 75% constriction at 1 Hz repetition rate) at a repetition rate of 10 Hz for 30 seconds rapidly decreased the bleeding rate. In all 6 cases treated with this regime, a nearly complete hemorrhage arrest has been achieved within a few seconds. The average blood loss from the femoral artery measured during 30 seconds of treatment and 30 seconds after that was about 7 times less than that of a non-treated control (0.14 vs. 1.05 ml, p = 0.001) (). In all untreated animals, bleeding still continued after the 1 minute-long blood collection, and the animal died within minutes if bleeding was not mechanically stopped at the end of the measurements. When treated with pulse amplitude of 30 V at 1 Hz (corresponding to 50% constriction threshold), there was no complete hemorrhage arrest, and therefore reduction in blood loss was less pronounced: (0.35 vs 1.05 ml, p = 0.005), as shown in ). Strong decrease in blood loss was also observed in the severed mesenteric arteries treated with 100 μs pulses of 40 V at 1 Hz (corresponding to 75% constriction threshold), as shown in .
Finite element computational modeling of the resistive heating during the maximum exposure (150 V, 100 μs/phase, 10 Hz, 30 s) demonstrated that the peak temperature rise at the end of the treatment was between 2.3°C with full blood vessel perfusion and 2.9°C, with no blood perfusion (see ). This estimate indicates that even the most intense regime of hemorrhage control did not involve thermal damage to the treated vessels. Modeling of resistive heating for reversible constriction (80 V, 1 μs/phase, 10 Hz, 2 min) showed a temperature rise of less than 0.02°C, indicating that the mechanism of vasoconstriction is not thermal.
Histological findings
Histological sections of the treated and non-treated femoral arteries are shown in . shows a cross-section of a femoral artery following complete vessel dissection and 30 seconds-long treatment with 100 μs/phase pulses of 150 V at a repetition rate of 10 Hz. For comparison, an untreated control tissue from the other leg is shown in . Treatment caused complete occlusion of the vessel and cessation of bleeding within a few seconds. Upon euthanasia and tissue fixation the vessels dilated somewhat, compared to the most constricted state because of smooth muscle relaxation. In the middle of a circular lumen one can see an acute blood clot attached to the endothelium (solid arrow). The width of the blood clot illustrates the size of the blood vessel in its constricted state, prior to excision and fixation. The smooth muscle contraction is evident by circular appearance of the vessel and by dense folding of the internal elastic lamina (dashed arrow). The endothelium, media and adventitia of the blood vessel appear unaffected by the treatment.
Discussion
Microsecond electrical pulses can induce vasoconstriction within a few seconds, in both arteries and veins. Upon termination of stimulation, the blood vessels dilate back to their original size within a few minutes. This reversible vasoconstriction can be repeated, and it does not seem to involve tissue damage. Upon stronger stimulation, a permanent blood clot may form, completely blocking the lumen of the blood vessel. Both the reversible vasoconstriction and irreversible clotting offer a powerful approach to hemorrhage control in non-compressible wounds. The extent of perfusion can be controlled by varying the amplitude, pulse duration, and pulse repetition rate. Since the flow rate in a cylindrical pipe is proportional to the fourth power of the diameter (Poiseuille's equation), even small constriction of the blood vessel should significantly reduce the flow.
Electrically induced vasoconstriction could result from several effects: stimulation of the sympathetic innervations of the blood vessels and direct stimulation of the smooth muscle, , , , . We couldn't find reports of a similarly profound pharmacological vasoconstriction - down to almost complete obstruction. This suggests that electrical pulses can induce much stronger contraction of the smooth muscles than pharmacological agents. Interestingly, similar extent of electrically-induced vasoconstriction has been observed in-vitro, with modulation by pulse amplitude, duration and repetition rate, , . Formation of the blood clot may result from localized vascular stasis or a response to injury of the vascular endothelium, , .
Histological evaluation of the tissue up to 3.5 hours after vasoconstriction revealed no obvious damage. However, a longer follow-up is required to detect potential development of the inflammatory tissue response, apoptotic effects or other long-term manifestations of mild tissue damage. Long term injury to smooth muscle in the blood vessels was observed one week following exposure to high electric field in rats, . Injury to vascular endothelium can further enhance the blood clotting and thrombosis.
Conventional thermal coagulation of blood vessels typically requires tens of Watts of power delivered by electrocautery or RF coagulator, , . Such techniques cause significant tissue injury and are not efficient in coagulation of large vessels. Typically, large vessels require mechanical ligation under direct visualization. Newer techniques such as Ligasure can thermally seal larger arteries, but they require bulky power supply, good visualization of the vessel and access to the vessel from all sides for accurate positioning of the surgical probe, all of which prevent the use of this technology in the field. In contrast, the low-power (few mW) electrical vasoconstriction helps reducing blood flow without thermal damage to the tissue, and may not require good visualization of the injured vessel for positioning of the tool. Since very low power is required for such stimulation, a small disposable device could be placed in the wounded area to reduce or stop local bleeding. Pulsatile muscle contraction in response to electrical stimulation could be minimized by using higher repetition rates.
In conclusion, electrical stimulation of vasculature by microsecond pulses can be used to control blood perfusion and reduce hemorrhage in non-compressible wounds. Temporary decrease in blood perfusion can be achieved in seconds using the reversible vasoconstriction regime, with vessels dilating back to their original size within minutes after termination of stimulation. This modality could be used for non-damaging hemorrhage control in surgery and during trauma care. Permanent blockage of bleeding is achieved upon vasoconstriction followed by initiation of clotting. For practical use in trauma care and for treatment of the battlefield injuries, a miniature device should be developed capable of delivering pulsed stimulation prior to arrival of the patient to the hospital. Due to low energy requirements a disposable battery-powered device can be just a few millimeters in width, so it can be inserted into the wound to stop local bleeding. Alternatively, a stimulator may remain outside the body, and electric current can be delivered to the area of interest via percutaneous penetrating needle electrodes, similarly to tumor ablation by electroporation [e.g.].